Welcome Guest. ( logon | register ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| Topic Tools | Message Format |
Author |
| ||
AsianML Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | S600 vs. Supra!!! --
| ||
#39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
cmitch Expert Date registered: Apr 2006 Location: Ala-Tenn Vehicle(s): 2002 ML320, 2005 S430 4Matic, 2010 F150 Super Crew Posts: 3412 | RE: S600 vs. Supra!!! Notice how the Supra warmed his tires up so he would get more traction. I think that's where the MB lost it even though it was ahead, initially. | ||
#39956 - in reply to #39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
AsianML Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | RE: S600 vs. Supra!!! cmitch - 8/21/2006 4:11 PM Notice how the Supra warmed his tires up so he would get more traction. I think that's where the MB lost it even though it was ahead, initially. The S did as well, just not as long. The S would make a great sleeper if you put the right (engine) mods in. | ||
#40005 - in reply to #39956 | |||
Author |
| ||
KERR Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! and who knows what turbo that supra was running. they said it was a single, so im sure on boost it was 600+ wheel hp. Hp does not get moving though... that was the benz killed it out of the hole. Dont get me wrong im not taking up for either car. both are amazing vehicles and if i could sale my built supra id have SL65 | ||
#43447 - in reply to #39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
nomad Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | RE: S600 vs. Supra!!! Cool The benz must have been crankin' out some serious hp itself being a Renntech The first run looked as though the Supra fumbled a shift but turbo-lag must have played it's part | ||
#43481 - in reply to #39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
sin0822 Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! isnt the s600 a really fucking heavy car with the v12 and everything? | ||
#45363 - in reply to #39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
AsianML Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! sin0822 - 9/19/2006 11:28 PM isnt the s600 a really fucking heavy car with the v12 and everything? It's the V12 that makes it fast. | ||
#45747 - in reply to #45363 | |||
Author |
| ||
sin0822 Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! well of course, is the s63 faster? | ||
#45783 - in reply to #39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
AsianML Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! sin0822 - 9/23/2006 1:04 AM well of course, is the s63 faster? S63 isn't even out yet. | ||
#45798 - in reply to #45783 | |||
Author |
| ||
NZ Benz Expert Date registered: Apr 2006 Location: New Zealand Vehicle(s): 1993 300SEL/S320 Posts: 2555 | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! sin0822 - 9/23/2006 1:04 AM well of course, is the s63 faster? One would hope so. | ||
#45864 - in reply to #45783 | |||
Author |
| ||
AsianML Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! S63 seems like it might be more nimbler, not faster. It's the same case with the E63 and E55. E55 has tons of brute force and slams you to the seat when you accelerate, and the power just keeps coming at you. The E63's power seems more linear, more smooth delivery, and it seems like it's been tuned (suspension) to compete with the M5 around the twisties. So I'm assuming the same thing with the S63 (W221) vs. S65 (both W220 and W221). The S63 motor just lacks the torque to get it moving as much/fast. Edited by AsianML 12/6/2006 10:40 PM | ||
#56099 - in reply to #45864 | |||
Author |
| ||
sin0822 Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! s600 0-60 4.5 s63 0-60 4.4 s65 0-60 4.3 | ||
#56104 - in reply to #39380 | |||
Author |
| ||
AsianML Date registered: Dec 1899 Location: Vehicle(s): | Re: S600 vs. Supra!!! The times might be almost the same, but just the feeling and the power delivery is totally different between the two engines. | ||
#56113 - in reply to #56104 | |||
« View previous thread :: View next thread » |
|
|