|
lennyr
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| SLK55 on another Forbes List
we're tied for 10th place for the Least Fuel Efficient Luxury Cars list. Woohoo!
http://www.forbes.com/2006/05/22/cx_dl_0523featslide_10.html?thisSp... |
|
| |
|
Dinoman
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| RE: SLK55 on another Forbes List
Repent!  Dinoman |
|
| |
|
bclark
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| RE: SLK55 on another Forbes List
Personally, I don't get it. I can't think of a more
gas efficient vehicle. For each tank of gas, you
get an agile, luxurious, beautiful (and sexy),
wind in your face ride |
|
| |
|
Ynot
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| Re: SLK55 on another Forbes List
lol, at least it made the list, whether it's good or bad.  |
|
| |
|
lennyr
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| RE: SLK55 on another Forbes List
I didn't actually cross-reference the lists, but if I recall correctly, the SLK55 is the only car on both Forbes' Coolest High Tech Cars and Luxury Gas Guzzlers list. |
|
| |
|
Dinoman
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| RE: SLK55 on another Forbes List
It sounds like there's nothing left to do but--hurry on down to your nearest Yugo dealer (that might be in Sarajevo)!  Dinoman |
|
| |
|
Shinigami
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| Re: SLK55 on another Forbes List
I just did 9.4 liters per hundred km's just today during a 160km trip. That's pretty darn efficient when you begin to compare it to the other super cars on offer. |
|
| |
|
alroumi
Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
| Re: SLK55 on another Forbes List
Who care's if it is at the end of the list or to, the ML came in 142 out 143 in Topgears List, and I am still enjoying it |
|
| |
