Welcome Guest. ( logon | register )   
FAQ Member List Albums Today's Posts Search

PointedThree :  Vans, Trucks, SUVs and Other Forums : G-Class : OM617 - OM617A

Page 1 of 1 1
OM617 - OM617A
Topic Tools Message Format
Author
Posted 6/16/2006 6:17 PM
VCR

Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
OM617 - OM617A

What kind of consumption can I expect of a 460 long version whit OM617? And whit an OM617A?
Thanks, Vasco
#24026
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/16/2006 6:21 PM
roughneck
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: UK, Germany & USA
Vehicle(s): 270 cdi.300 GD 300 GE.lwb 300 GE.swb. Disco 2
Posts: 4398
2000
RE: OM617 - OM617A

On a OM 617 I get about 28 mpg on a 617a around 25mpg but it depends a great deal on how you drive.
#24028 - in reply to #24026
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/18/2006 4:14 PM
AlanMcR
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: US, CA, Los Altos
Vehicle(s): G300DT E300DT 230SL
Posts: 3500
2000
RE: OM617 - OM617A

Are you measuring your mileage in British mpG's? I got 24mpg (US), once. That was nearly empty, warmed up, mostly downhill with a tailwind.
#24481 - in reply to #24028
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/18/2006 6:19 PM
dai
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Vehicle(s): 300GD 300TD BMW R100RS Landini 80F
Posts: 2110
2000
Re: OM617 - OM617A

Alan, they must have magic diesel over there. I tend to drive hard and 20 mpg is about it with a NA 617 in the G.

-Dai
#24522 - in reply to #24481
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/18/2006 7:31 PM
Benz-Dady

Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
Re: OM617 - OM617A

on my 300GD LWB I get 19-20 mpg on average
#24529 - in reply to #24026
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/19/2006 7:16 AM
w.james
Veteran




Date registered: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Vehicle(s): 84 280 GE 617A 5sp getrag
Posts: 239
100
Re: OM617 - OM617A


5sp Getrg does help!
#24642 - in reply to #24026
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/19/2006 8:17 AM
Fenalaar
Elite Veteran


Date registered: May 2006
Location: Narvik, Norway
Vehicle(s): 2001 ML270CDI, Polaris 400L Big Boss
Posts: 826
500
Re: OM617 - OM617A

dai - 6/19/2006 12:19 AM

Alan, they must have magic diesel over there. I tend to drive hard and 20 mpg is about it with a NA 617 in the G.

-Dai


If you drive hard, you'll get much poorer consumption figures.

If you drive easy and keep to around 80km/h, you'll get around 22-24mpg (US), even with an automatic.

In the city, you'll use more. If you really step on it, and stay at 100-110km/h for long periods of time, you can get as low as 12-13mpg (US).

Face it - the 460 is not built for speed. Keep a sedate speed and go a little easy on it, and you'll use much less fuel. Adding 10km/h to your aveage speed won't really get you there all that much faster, unless you're driving long distances.

Kind regards

Johan-Kr
#24650 - in reply to #24522
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/19/2006 9:43 AM
VCR

Date registered: Dec 1899
Location:
Vehicle(s):
Re: OM617 - OM617A

Thank you all for the information. I think I have posed the question in an incorrect way.

I was trying to establish if the OM617.952 is more efficient than the OM617.931 and what kind of difference in consumption I could expect.

I’m looking at a long 460 whit an OM617.952 and same one told me to expect consumptions in the 25L for 100Km (9 mpg). I find this way too much especially because I’m under the impression that this engine is more efficient.
#24679 - in reply to #24026
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/19/2006 12:16 PM
dai
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Vehicle(s): 300GD 300TD BMW R100RS Landini 80F
Posts: 2110
2000
Re: OM617 - OM617A

You can expect in the realm of 20+ mpg from the OM617.952 in a G chassis. It has significantly more power and torque than the .931. The problem is it is pushing around a big heavy thing that is not too aerodynamic, and is spinning both axles full time. Our 123 Turbo D Wagon gets on average 26/27 mpg all of the time. It will go 75 mph all day long on the freeway and return that mpg. My naturally aspirated 300td would get similar fuel economy but did not have the power for sustained high speed. If driven very slowly it would return 30mpg. Driving style makes a difference and I think if you drove the hell out of it you wouldn't get less than 16/18 or so mpg. 9 mpg is ridiculous.

-Dai
#24732 - in reply to #24679
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/19/2006 10:37 PM
stevegsmith
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: SF Bay Area, CA USA
Vehicle(s): 82 300GD WVO, 06 Jeep Lib CRD B99
Posts: 1301
1000
Re: OM617 - OM617A

18ish for me.
#24952 - in reply to #24026
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/20/2006 1:58 AM
dai
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Vehicle(s): 300GD 300TD BMW R100RS Landini 80F
Posts: 2110
2000
Re: OM617 - OM617A

Steve do you think you are getting a bit lower fuel economy due to straight vegetable oil that you are burning and city driving?

-Dai
#24984 - in reply to #24732
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Author
Posted 6/20/2006 12:11 PM
AlanMcR
Expert




Date registered: Apr 2006
Location: US, CA, Los Altos
Vehicle(s): G300DT E300DT 230SL
Posts: 3500
2000
Re: OM617 - OM617A

Yeah, MPG dropps about 10% on veggie oil. The reduction would probably be less if I properly pre-heated the oil and refreshed the injectors. Those items are somewhere on the back side of my to-do list.
#25049 - in reply to #24984
Top of the page Bottom of the page
« View previous thread :: View next thread »
Page 1 of 1 1
Forum Jump :
All times are EST.  The time is now 4:15:51 AM.

Execution: 0.251 seconds, 99 cached, 9 executed.